Search BL Rag
Recent Activity
Who's on the BL Rag

Caption This


Click on the photo to submit your captions

About This Site

The BL RAG is dedicated to the idea of free expression, thus we welcome and encourage reader  commentary on current events and issues, music, sports, or other topics of interest, no matter what one's political leanings or worldview.

  

Site Management:

Front Page Section Editors: GrayRider and WesMorgan1

Other Front Page Editors: Bozio and Machiavelli

Smack Talk Editors: kwAwk and Skinnydipinacid

Miscellanea Editors: Kimboskerov, Xanadu, and Zoy Clem

Sports Editors: kwAwk and Skinnydipinacid

Games & Movie Editors: Skinnydipinacid

Poetry Editors: Lenny

Music Editors: Various (see the music schedule below).

***

Site Editors: Skinnydipinacid and Zoy Clem

Maintenance Man: Master Admin Dude

 

Alumni:
Redbeard, Winston, Jimmmco

 

KRAG Music Section Schedule:

Sunday - Zoy Clem

Monday - Xanadu

Tuesday - kwAwk

Wednesday - GrayRider

Thursday - Machiavelli

Friday - Fornax

Saturday - Skinnydipinacid

On-call - Schwabman

KRAG Free-n-Legal

Our latest Free-n-Legal MP3s

Powered by Squarespace
Use OpenOffice.org

This Pot is Stirred Regularly by:  kwAwk & skinnydipinacid

Friday
05Feb2010

Remember All The Hillary Hubbub? Here We Go Again...

Back when Bill Clinton was running for President, the political right expressed a great concern over the potential role of Hillary Clinton in her husband's Administration.  Much was made of the point that the First Lady has no role in policy discussions, and that we weren't electing her to do anything in government.  That clamor intensified when she was given the portfolio for the Clinton Administration's healthcare reform activities.  So, one would think that GOPers would have no reasons to bring their spouses inside the bubble, right?

Well, it seems that at least one leading conservative has no qualms about involving their spouse in the inner working of government.  From MSNBC:

Officially he was the first gentleman of Alaska. More people called him the "first dude." But newly released e-mails show that Todd Palin was busy doing more than snow machine driving and salmon fishing during Sarah Palin's two and a half years as governor and vice presidential candidate.

Nearly 3,000 pages of e-mails that Todd Palin exchanged with state officials, which were released to msnbc.com and NBC News by the state of Alaska under its public records law, draw a picture of a Palin administration where the governor's husband got involved in a judicial appointment, monitored contract negotiations with public employee unions, received background checks on a corporate CEO, added his approval or disapproval to state board appointments and passed financial information marked "confidential" from his oil company employer to a state attorney.

Um...wow.  I had no idea that Todd was so broadly qualified.  Oh, wait, there's more:

While 1,200 separate e-mails were released this week, 243 others were withheld by the state under a claim that executive privilege extends to Todd Palin as an unpaid adviser to the government.

Executive privilege?  "Unpaid adviser?"  How can executive privilege extend to something you weren't supposed to be doing in the first place?

The still-secret e-mails between Todd Palin and senior officials reach into countless areas of state government and politics: potential board appointees, constituent complaints, use of the state jet, oil and gas production,  marine regulation, gas pipeline bids, postsecondary education, wildfires, native Alaskan issues, the state effort to save the Matanuska Maid dairy, budget planning, potential budget vetoes, oil shale leasing, "strategy for responding to media allegations," staffing at the mansion, pier diem payments to the governor for travel, "strategy for responding to questions about pregnancy," potential cuts to the governor's staff, "confidentiality issues," Bureau of Land Management land transfers and trespass issues and requests to the U.S. transportation secretary.

Amazing, isn't it?  Most egregious of all is that a significant amount of work was done directly between Todd Palin and government staff, without the Governor's involvement.  Of course, they did their best to keep this out of the public eye, even though they now claim that he was a "unpaid adviser:"

Many of the e-mails on public policy issues that msnbc.com reviewed were written using private e-mail accounts on Yahoo and other services. The governor and her top aides set up accounts outside the state system, supposedly outside the reach of the public records laws. Outside accounts also helped avoid any violation of the state law against using public resources for campaigning.

I'm sure that all those who berated the notion of Hillary Clinton participating in her husband's Administration will be lining up to criticize this as well - but I'm not holding my breath.

Friday
05Feb2010

NBC Honors Black History Month With Fried Chicken, Collard Greens and Cornbread

Offensive enough that somebody took this photo for all to see:

What?   NO watermelon??    How offensive is that?!?

Luckily, their NBC discount still applies...  
no word on whether they'll accept food stamps or not.

Friday
05Feb2010

Funny $#!% for a Friday!

We've seen it before, our gracious president, so eloquently bowing to world leaders abroad.   It only makes sense that he'd do the same here as he meets with the powerful, adored, and influential... Mayor of Tampa?

 

I'm still waiting for his first curtsy

 

Wednesday
03Feb2010

That's the Ole Pepper

From CNN.com....

President Obama tore into the Republican opposition on Capitol Hill Wednesday, blaming the GOP for what he called politically motivated opposition on virtually every issue.

Democrats have been willing to incorporate Republican ideas on health care and other issues, he said, but Republicans have not been willing to do the same.

Addressing a gathering of Senate Democrats, Obama promised to "call (Republicans) out when (Democrats) extend a hand and get a fist in return."

Several Democrats facing tough election fights this November were given time to ask the president questions on high-profile issues such as trade and deficit reduction. Much of the president's time, however, was used to lash out at GOP tactics.

Senate Republicans, he said, have tried to employ the filibuster more over the past year than in all of the 1950s and 1960s combined. The GOP's strategy has been "20 years of obstruction packed into one," he said.

"If you want to govern, you can't just say no," he argued. "It can't be about just scoring points." The filibuster, he added, only works as intended if there is a "genuine spirit of compromise."

This is exactly what has been missing over the first year of the Obama administration.  There is nothing wrong with reaching across the aisle for bipartisan bills, but that only works when both sides are willing to deal in good faith and Republicans haven't been.

 

Monday
01Feb2010

When All Else Fails....

...throw up enough dirt in the air to cloud the issue.  From Foxnews...

Although President Barack Obama's push for a health care overhaul has stalled, conservative lawmakers in about half the states are forging ahead with constitutional amendments to ban government health insurance mandates.

The proposals would assert a state-based right for people to pay medical bills from their own pocketbooks and prohibit penalties against those who refuse to carry health insurance.

In many states, the proposals began as a backlash to Democratic health care plans pending in Congress. But instead of backing away after a Massachusetts election gave Senate Republicans the filibuster power to halt the health care legislation, many state lawmakers are ramping up their efforts with a new enthusiasm.

The moves reflect the continued political potency of the issue for conservatives, who have used it extensively for fundraising and attracting new supportersThe legal impact of any state measures may be questionable because courts generally have held that federal laws trump those in states.

Lawmakers in 34 states now have filed or proposed amendments to their state constitutions or statutes rejecting health insurance mandates, according to the American Legislative Exchange Council, a nonprofit group that promotes limited government that is helping coordinate the efforts. Many of those proposals are targeted for the November ballot, assuring that health care remains a hot topic as hundreds of federal and state lawmakers face reelection.

 Gee whiz, wasn't the arguement last week that Republicans thought the solution to healthcare reform was to allow interstate insurance purchases?  The word interstate of course automatically invoking the Interstate Commerence Clause of the US Constitution?

Now the arguement is that healthcare reform is a state's rights issue?  So quickly?  It couldn't be that people on the right are simply lieing about their motivations could it?  That they are simply paranoid about the notion of government and think that the notion of providing to people who can't afford it is only encouraging the vermin to breed?

 

Monday
01Feb2010

Caption This Presidential Debate

 

You've played this trick on me before... stop making me sound conservative!

 

Friday
29Jan2010

This Redefines Punked

This is the funniest video I've come across in a while.....

 

Thursday
28Jan2010

Atheists Gone Wild

Talk about a fight you can't win.

An atheist organization is blasting the U.S. Postal Service for its plan to honor Mother Teresa with a commemorative stamp, saying it violates postal regulations against honoring "individuals whose principal achievements are associated with religious undertakings."

The Freedom from Religion Foundation is urging its supporters to boycott the stamp — and also to engage in a letter-writing campaign to spread the word about what it calls the "darker side" of Mother Teresa.

This only serves to make atheists look petty and stupid.

 

Monday
25Jan2010

The Tide is Turning

There's been a lot of back and forth the past week or so on the issue of healthcare reform but it looks like the Dem leadership is finally getting on the same page....

Democratic congressional leaders are uniting around their last, best hope for salvaging President Barack Obama's sweeping health care overhaul.

Their plan is to pass the Senate bill with some changes to accommodate House Democrats, senior Democratic aides said Monday. Leaders will present the idea to the rank and file this week, but it's unclear that they will have the votes to move forward.

Last week's victory by Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts cost Democrats the 60th vote they need to maintain undisputed control of the Senate, jeopardizing the outcome of the health care bill just when Obama had brokered a final deal on most of the major issues.

"We've put so much effort into this, so much hard work, and we were so close to doing some significant things. Now we have to find the political path that brings us out. And it's not easy," the No. 2 Senate Democrat, Dick Durbin of Illinois, said Monday.

This really is the only path that makes sence for the Democrats.   Fail to pass it and they'll look like complete fools.   Even if they pass the exact same bill under a proposed do over with Republicans, Republicans will only crow for the next year how they saved healthcare reform and how Democrats couldn't govern when they had a chance.

It's good to see level heads starting to prevail.

Sunday
24Jan2010

Who Is Barack Obama?

Reading one of my favorite bloggers, John Cole, and his frustration with Democrats not being supportive enough of President Obama and his agenda got me thinking about the political situation right now and the President and his base.

The only conclusion I could come up with is that people just don't know who Obama is and what he stands for.   When he invited Rick Warren to come to the inaugural address, what was his motivation for doing so?  What purpose did it serve?  Was it believed that doing so would soften right wing resistence to allowing gays in the military or gay marriage?  Doesn't seem to have worked, as the only people who remember Rick Warren speaking at the inaguration are those Obama supporters who were clearly upset by the gesture.

When President Obama seemed to push for re-admittance of Joe Lieberman to the Democratic caucus?  What purpose did that serve?  To pull in that centrist Lieberman vote?  Is there such thing as a centrist Lieberman vote?  The truth is the only people who really care that he did it are those that worked so hard to push Lieberman out of the caucus in the first place.

When President Obama was for the public option before he was against it.  What was the thought process there?  Was he really caught so off guard that so many people on the left felt it was an incredibly important part of health care reform, or was he just as much on board with the public option until it became politically expedient not to be?

Next on the agenda is financial reform.  The rumblings out of Washington are that Obama is going to come down on the side of getting tough with Wall Street and the banking industry.  Sounds good.  Is it too good to be true perhaps?  When the going gets tought will Obama be content to give Wall Street a good finger wag and move on his merry way?  I don't know.  Does anybody?

The thought process seems to be that since Obama was elected as a Democrat that we other Democrats should just follow along behind happily and be thankful that a Republican isn't President.  A lot of us though are Democrats for a reason, and that is because they believe in Democratic values.  We even believe that Democratic values are worth fighting for.

I for one am waiting and watching to see where Obama goes from here.   Is this going to be about how much Obama can rile up the base to get elected only to play down the base during his time in office, ala Republicans and the religious right, or is Obama really a Democrat who is going to nudge the ball towards the goal line.