Search BL Rag
Recent Activity
Our Recent Guests

twitter icon

Get the FREE BL-idget installed on YOUR Website at Widgetbox.com

Caption This


Click the photo to submit your captions

About This Site

The BL RAG is dedicated to the idea of free expression, thus we welcome and encourage reader  commentary on current events and issues, music, sports, or other topics of interest, no matter what one's political leanings or worldview.

  

Site Management:

Front Page Section Editors: GrayRider, WesMorgan1, and Machiavelli

Smack Talk Editor: Skinnydipinacid

Miscellanea Editor: Zoy Clem

Sports Editor: Skinnydipinacid

Games & Movie Editor: Skinnydipinacid

Poetry Editor: Lenny

Music Editors: Machiavelli

***

Site Editors: Skinnydipinacid and Zoy Clem

Maintenance Man: Master Admin Dude

 

Alumni:
Redbeard, Winston, Jimmmco

 

KRAG Music Section Schedule:

Sunday - Jgeagle5

Monday - Xanadu

Tuesday - Machiavelli

Wednesday - GrayRider

Thursday - Machiavelli

Friday - Fornax

Saturday - Skinnydipinacid

On-call - Schwabman and Zoy Clem

KRAG Free-n-Legal

Our latest Free-n-Legal MP3s

« Is Kim Jong Illin'? | Main | Bi-Partisan Bill Introduced To Block Civil Trials Of Terrorists »
Friday
Feb052010

Look Who's Talking

From CNN:

Senior Obama administration officials revealed late Tuesday they've secretly gained the cooperation of family members of Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab to help get the Christmas Day airline bomb suspect talking.

The cooperation effort has led to actionable intelligence that could help prevent terror attempts on U.S. soil, the senior officials said. [...]

The U.S. officials later traveled to Nigeria's capital city, Abuja, and eventually gained the trust of two unidentified relatives of the suspect.  On January 17, the FBI agents secretly flew back to the U.S. with the two relatives in order to work with the suspect.

One senior Obama administration official said the family members privately conveyed to the suspect they "had complete trust in the U.S. system" and they believed he "would be treated fairly" by the Obama administration.

The senior administration officials said that since AbdulMutallab began talking to investigation again last week, he has been cooperating on a daily basis.

Wow...gaining trust...no torture...and the suspect is cooperating.

So, was it really worth all the "weak on terror" nonsense coming from the likes of Susan Collins?  If the guy is cooperating, and if the intelligence provided is accurate and "actionable," then where's the harm?  It isn't as if the guy is going to win an acquital; the evidence is as airtight as it gets.

I'm anxiously awaiting someone to tell me how tossing him in isolation and throwing away the key would have been a better approach.  At worst, I think this sort of thing is a case-by-case judgment call; they aren't all going to fit the same mold, and it's ridiculous to suggest that they will.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (10)

What benefit was there for the WH to tell everyone he was 'talking" other than to cover their ass? I agree with Senator Bond, this was overtly political ploy by the WH to "try" and curtail the soft on terror label they so justly deserve. Also, after five weeks it’s a little late to honk your horn over the rich vein of information you’re getting. After shutting down the original interrogation after a mere 50-minutes to the protests of the FBI, CIA and NIS; the real time intelligence he could have provided has gone cold.

Quite the triumph Barack Obama. We can all sleep sounder tonight CIC.

February 5, 2010 at 16:25 | Unregistered CommenterThomas Miller

Actually, you're once again working from wrong information, TM. Here's the info you're missing.

Are you suggesting, then, that Collins should be permitted to simply lie like this?

I remain concerned that there was no consultation with intelligence officials before the Department of Justice unilaterally decided to treat Abdulmutallab as if he were an ordinary criminal.
As Gibbs noted at the link above, all the players were fully involved in the decision to indict him in civilian court. Collins was simply using fear to take a cheap shot that didn't even match the facts.


For comparison purposes, here's a description of the nearly-identical treatment afforded Richard Reid, the shoe bomber. Of course, now Republicans say that was a mistake:

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has said some of the Bush administration actions in the case were a mistake. At a Capitol stakeout on Tuesday, McConnell said: "Regardless of what may have happened in the past, and we have had some terrorists tried in U.S. courts, we've learned from that. It's a mistake.Right, Mitch - I don't remember you complaining too loudly at the time...and how do four guilty pleas from Reid and a life sentence constitute "a mistake?"

February 5, 2010 at 16:34 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

BS

February 5, 2010 at 17:27 | Unregistered CommenterTijuana

Right, Tijuana, anything that contradicts your presuppositions is "BS." Got it.

February 5, 2010 at 21:30 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Wes;

The investigation was shut down after 50 minutes. That's a fact NO ONE who isn’t left of the Truthers refutes. Now he talks five weeks after the fact and the libs scream "see the process worked." Fortunately Americans see dems as weak on terror as always. President One-Term can create all the straw men he wants but his bs is running cold with Americans

February 5, 2010 at 21:56 | Unregistered CommenterThomas Miller

I meant interrogation, not investigation.

February 5, 2010 at 21:57 | Unregistered CommenterThomas Miller

What's your alternative, TM - waterboarding every suspect?

February 5, 2010 at 22:18 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Really, Wes? Is waterboarding our only alternative?

February 6, 2010 at 13:11 | Unregistered CommenterMachiavelli

I wonder what kind of deal we had to give this terrorist in exchange for cooperation?

February 7, 2010 at 22:35 | Unregistered CommenterMachiavelli

Really, Wes? Is waterboarding our only alternative?
Of course not, Machiavelli (and waterboarding shouldn't be an option in my book). I just wondered what alternatives he might have in mind.

February 8, 2010 at 11:53 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.