Search BL Rag
Recent Activity
Our Recent Guests

twitter icon

Get the FREE BL-idget installed on YOUR Website at Widgetbox.com

Caption This


Click the photo to submit your captions

About This Site

The BL RAG is dedicated to the idea of free expression, thus we welcome and encourage reader  commentary on current events and issues, music, sports, or other topics of interest, no matter what one's political leanings or worldview.

  

Site Management:

Front Page Section Editors: GrayRider, Machiavelli, WesMorgan1, and William Amos

Smack Talk Editor: Skinnydipinacid

Miscellanea Editor: Zoy Clem

Sports Editor: Skinnydipinacid

Games & Movie Editor: Skinnydipinacid

Poetry Editor: Lenny

Music Editors: Machiavelli

***

Site Editors: Skinnydipinacid and Zoy Clem

Maintenance Man: Master Admin Dude

 

Alumni:
Redbeard, Winston, Jimmmco

 

KRAG Music Section Schedule:

Sunday - Jgeagle5

Monday - Xanadu

Tuesday - Machiavelli

Wednesday - GrayRider

Thursday - Machiavelli

Friday - Fornax

Saturday - Skinnydipinacid

On-call - Schwabman and Zoy Clem

KRAG Free-n-Legal

Our latest Free-n-Legal MP3s

« Here We Go Again -- Fringe On Parade | Main | Dick Armey Lets One Slip »
Tuesday
Sep152009

ACORN Falls Off the Money Tree

The Senate took a saw to ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) and cut off a funding stream by denying the Department of Housing and Urban Development from granting funds to the community organization effort.  

This decision is coming off of a string of videos surfacing since last Wednesday, causing ACORN to suffer bad publicity due to multiple workers being caught on tape by 2 conservative activists posing as a prostitute named Kenya and her pimp dressed in flashy attire and a hidden camera.  In the videos ACORN employees gave advice on house-buying and how to account on tax forms for the woman's income, list 13 year old El Salvador being brought in illegally for a child sex operation as dependents and even instructing the two how to filter the money made in the illegal business venture into "the pimp's" campaign fund.

The final vote:  83-7  

And who do you suppose would ever try to defend such actions you ask?  

Why none other than the following:

  • Dick Durbin (D-IL)
  • Roland Burris (D-IL)
  • Robert Casey (D-PA)
  • Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
  • Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
  • Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
  • Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

I like how Ed Morrissey put it...  can we assume that Illinois and Vermont are especially sympathetic to child-whoring pimp assistance?   As Ed also reported:

...in the beginning of the vote it appeared that Democrats might resist.  Initially, a half-dozen Democrats cast votes in opposition to the amendment.  A few more cast votes against it as the rest of the Senate voted, but the tide appeared to shift.  More and more Democrats signed onto the amendment, and votes started changing.  One male voice could be heard in the chamber saying, “I want to change my vote!”  Among those who changed their votes: Tom Udall (D-NM), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), and Herb Kohl (D-WI).

Republicans are putting added pressure on the group by calling for added congressional hearings and IRS audits of ACORN following the release of three videotapes, with a rumored 4th to be released today.   Should make for some interesting television from what I hear.

On a side note, I'm wondering if Obama will ever comment on any of this.   Given our media's extensive reporting (note the lack of seriousness in my fingers) on this matter, I'm sure it'll happen any day now. 

I am quite happy to see my Representative Steve King (R-IA) taking such an active role in all of this. As he put it, "If you see that it's endemic, that it's at least three cities will help support and organize and provide for lending to homes of prostitution for underage girls that come from foreign countries that are likely illegal, how many drugs are being dealt out of houses facilitated by ACORN?"   Further more, I highly doubt ACORN is doing anything to prevent it from happening once they know what's going on.  

ACORN offerered up this wonderful nonsense in a statement from ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis:   "We’re disappointed that the Senate took the rare and politically convenient step of supporting eliminating some federal funding for a single organization, one that has been the target of a multi-year political assault stemming variously from the Bush White House, Fox News, and other conservative quarters." 

Uh, yeah... right.   Good judgement mixed with the witnessing of despicable actions has nothing to do it.  (How does it go?  ::chuckle::)  Good luck suing those two youngsters who cracked your ACORN organization Bertha.  I look forward to hearing more of your desperate spin.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (41)

I'm still undecided whether this picture of Obama is photo shopped?

September 15, 2009 at 08:06 | Unregistered CommenterThomas Miller

who do you suppose would ever try to defend such actions . . . can we assume that Illinois and Vermont are especially sympathetic to child-whoring pimp assistance?

Well, this is a familiar wingnut-style sort of “reasoning”: anyone who thinks it might be overreacting to block an entire organization from bidding for federal money (the ‘Tardicans’ THIRD attempt to do so this year, btw), is a per se defender of child prostitution and tax fraud.

Nice “logic.” By that reasoning, anyone who thinks Blackwater a legitimate bidder for funds is a per se defender of the drunken murder of civilians.

Stop being ridiculous, skinny. You know full well Durbin, et al. aren’t defending child prostitution and tax fraud. Come off it. Or is sputtering hissyfit indignation just the sweet crack of Wnuttery you can’t don’t wanna kick?

September 15, 2009 at 09:21 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

Hahahaha... RIGHT! In the left wing world, helping a pimp and hooker get housing to work the field, start up a sex trade by importing illegal immigrants, cheat taxes by stating said illegals as dependents and then even show them how to filter said funds into a political campaign (I'm sure he wasn't running as a Republican, able to receive such extensive help)...

... yes helping with that ISN'T defending child prostitution or tax fraud.... not even campaign fraud. Nope, not at all. With that kind of thinking, it's no wonder the left doen't think ACORN was gulty of voter fraud. Too funny.

September 15, 2009 at 09:41 | Unregistered CommenterBEEFCAKE

So, then, using this same rationale, we'll all agree to prohibit KBR, Blackwater/Xe, and Wackenhut from all future government contracting opportunities?

September 15, 2009 at 09:56 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

I think it's prudent to cut off federal funding until the organization is thoroughly investigated.

September 15, 2009 at 10:02 | Unregistered Commentermachiavelli

More of the same liberal operating procedure. HRW Suspends Nazi Memorabilia Enthusiast. But nothing to see here. We, the leftist truthers, care about the poor and the oppressed!

September 15, 2009 at 11:03 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

Normal people who care about honesty/decency would have risen to call for investigation into such a corrupt organization like ACORN. The silence and the excuse of the left speaks for itself.

September 15, 2009 at 11:04 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

Good LoveDoggy, chasing after the latest nonsensical Reichwing Hissyfit!

Good Doggie! Here's a biscuit!!

September 15, 2009 at 11:18 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

Winston,
Are you missing your adult supervision in CNC? Since you are thirsting for more Kool-Aid, being a Kool-Aid drinker has its perks! The famous Obama Kool-Aid drinker (who is Obama 's favorite blogger) got special treatment. But nothing to see here. We, Van Jones truthers, care about the rule of law!

September 15, 2009 at 11:21 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

Charlie Gibson and ABC didn't know about the ACORN scandal. The fake outrage for all things Tea Party etc... seems so phony. These people are willing to serve as propagandists now.

September 15, 2009 at 11:24 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

nothing to see here

Oh, indeed. I've stopped even caring to check out whatever particular "scandals' you're bloviating breathlessly about at any given moment. It must be a function of your always marked but now accelerating attention impairment.

Chase your own wingnut sticks, Doggy. I ain't your monkey.

September 15, 2009 at 11:46 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

MSNBC is out there criticizing the entrapment these two people implemented in catching ACORN... once again carrying the water for the far left. Maybe we'll be fortunate enough to see Olbermann and Maddow use the words "sputtering hissyfits" to explain the feelings of normal thinking people... that's certain to work. That'll save ACORN/Obama.

Apparently, MSNBC/NBC doesn't seem to remember their "to catch a predator" series, in which they implemented the EXACT SAME FUCKING PROCEDURES while filming their show. Oh the sweet absurdity. I'll give CNN some credit because they've at least made a slight effort in covering this story (probably wishing they hadn't run Glenn Beck out of the building right about now) but the other networks should be completely ashamed of their reporting.

September 15, 2009 at 11:47 | Registered Commenterskinnydipinacid

I ain't your monkey.
--------------------------
We know, you are simply an Obama/Van Jones truther! So I know that you are not interested in anything other than the usual Obama/Van Jones Kool-Aid.

September 15, 2009 at 11:48 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

Apparently, MSNBC/NBC doesn't seem to remember their "to catch a predator" series, in which they implemented the EXACT SAME FUCKING PROCEDURES while filming their show.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They are all Van Jones/Obama truthers now.

September 15, 2009 at 11:52 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

MSNBC is out there criticizing the entrapment these two people implemented
Aren’t we jumping headlong off the cliff here!

The exact words O’Donnell used were: “I think it should be noted, to be fair, though, that this might be viewed as entrapment.” And if you know what “entrapment” means, I don’t see, frankly, how that’s even arguable; it most certainly might.

they [MSNBC] implemented the EXACT SAME F***ING PROCEDURES [in “To Catch a Predator.”]

Actually I can think of several important distinctions. If you put a little thought into it, I’ll bet you could, too.

September 15, 2009 at 11:59 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

More ACORN

And maybe a comment from the Obama administration? After all, as Theresa notes in her own words, ACORN is currently working with Washington on passing health care reform, AND the president himself--a former ACORN attorney--said these groups would play a part in "shaping the agenda" for his administration.

September 15, 2009 at 12:02 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

Really? Because if I'm not mistaken ACORN would be totally for old men having sex with underage girls... given the video evidence. Just saying. (actually, now that I think about it... the Rathke brothers kinda look like some of the people that were busted on that Chris Hansen special)

Maybe if I hid my head in your sandbox for a while I'd see the light.

September 15, 2009 at 12:03 | Registered Commenterskinnydipinacid

The exact words O’Donnell used were: “I think it should be noted, to be fair, though, that this might be viewed as entrapment.” And if you know what “entrapment” means, I don’t see, frankly, how that’s even arguable; it most certainly might.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure, we, the Obama/Van Jones truthers, understand the plight of underage minority girls. This type of exposure hurts their employment! We need to defend ACORN against these attacks on their service to the poor underage minority girls.

September 15, 2009 at 12:05 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

Entrapment is irrelevant. The kids that did the videos aren't law enforcement.

Let's not lose sight of the real issue here. ACORN has consistently shown a tendency to cavalierly engage in illegal and immoral activity.

September 15, 2009 at 12:10 | Registered CommenterGrayRider

1) If there's evidence that ties regional/national ACORN folks to criminal activity, nail 'em. I did see that one ACORN official (as opposed to the part-time temporary jobbers) did plead guilty to setting illegal quotas for voter registration; I hope he gets the maximum penalty.

2) Congressional "investigations" have never accomplished much, especially since Congress can be quick to grant immunity in exchange for testimony; I'd much rather see straightforward investigations by the appropriate law enforcement agencies. If we really want to nail folks breaking the law--and see them penalized appropriately--then it's a job for the police, not the Congress...

3) As far as NBC/MSNBC is concerned, I would suggest that the difference between their "To Catch A Predator" series and these incidents is that (after the second installment of TCAP) law enforcement was directly involved, and safeguards were put in place to avoid entrapment charges. The folks in this case didn't do anything to involve LE agencies (I wish they would have, just so the clowns in the video could be properly busted.)

4) Until such time as the national organization may be cleared, I think it completely reasonable to cut off any eligibility for Federal funds. Normally, this wouldn't happen until there was actual evidence against the national organization, but this has reached the 'appearance of impropriety' stage at which politicians start looking for cover.

5) As far as the voter registration fraud indictments are concerned, I think a key point is going to be how many of the fraudulent registrations were self-reported. I mentioned (in another ACORN thread) that the registrar of voters in at least one case has stated that she never would have known of the fraud had ACORN not reported it themselves.

6) We do need to keep in mind that any chapter-based organization is subject to this sort of thing. Given malfeasance by individual chapters, do we automatically indict the entire organization?

September 15, 2009 at 12:14 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

News in the alternate reality:

Joe Wilson needs to apologize
Joe Wilson needs to apologize again
Joe Wilson needs to bake Obama cupcakes
Joe Wilson should have make up sex with Obama
Wingnuts are sputtering lunatics everyday, including 9-12
George Bush joked about Hillary Clinton's ‘fat keister’
Bernanke: U.S. Recession is 'Very Likely' Over
(no.... seriously this time... we promise)

and most importantly...

...Joe Wilson is a big fat doodooo poopy-head racist hatemongering neocon bastard.

(yet ironically, nothing about ACORN on these lefty sites, minus them blaming Fox News)

September 15, 2009 at 12:16 | Unregistered CommenterSDiA

I agree with your points Wes, with the exception of #6... Although largely overlooked, ACORN abuses have been repeatedly reported across the nation over an expanded time frame.

September 15, 2009 at 12:19 | Registered CommenterGrayRider

... dare I add, and repeatedly ignored by the moonbat media.

September 15, 2009 at 12:21 | Registered Commenterskinnydipinacid

You may dare indeed, sir.

September 15, 2009 at 12:25 | Registered CommenterGrayRider

We do need to keep in mind that any chapter-based organization is subject to this sort of thing. Given malfeasance by individual chapters, do we automatically indict the entire organization?
----------------------------------------------------
Remember Abu Graihb? I score this as another typical liberal operating procedure. More recently, they even have leftist plants to smear the whole Tea Party movement. Another example of leftist trutherism for me.

September 15, 2009 at 12:42 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

ACORN has consistently shown a tendency to cavalierly engage in illegal and immoral activity.

So has Blackwater, except in their case with lethal results.

Should Blackwater (or "Xe') be barred from seeking federal dollars?

Is arguing that they shouldn't the same as condoning the drunken murder of civilians?

September 15, 2009 at 12:52 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

are we talking about Ted Kennedy?

September 15, 2009 at 12:54 | Registered Commenterskinnydipinacid

So has Blackwater, except in their case with lethal results.

Should Blackwater (or "Xe') be barred from seeking federal dollars?

Is arguing that they shouldn't the same as condoning the drunken murder of civilians?

If those things have indeed occurred, then action against them is warranted, I'm not arguing that point. But should ACORN's behavior be overlooked and excused just because we can point to some other entity's bad behavior?

September 15, 2009 at 13:03 | Registered CommenterGrayRider

Oh man, this is just getting better and better by the day.

http://biggovernment.com/2009/09/15/exclusive-acorn-illegally-operating-in-maryland/

September 15, 2009 at 13:08 | Unregistered CommenterBEEFCAKE

wow... that's amazing BEEF...
and in Obama's backyard nonetheless.
(worthy of again, no comment)

Roman made a great point in that article:

The Maryland Attorney General has made noise about prosecuting the intrepid journalists who undercovered the misdeeds of ACORN employees. Perhaps he should focus instead on how ACORN was able to operate without a license in his state.

Too true.

September 15, 2009 at 13:39 | Unregistered CommenterSDiA
September 15, 2009 at 13:46 | Unregistered CommenterLAI

should ACORN's behavior be overlooked and excused just because we can point to some other entity's bad behavior?

I was making a different point, GR, namely: one could argue that Blackwater ought not be eligible for federal funds because of serious misbehavior by several of its employees and agents.

Now, I think there are probably pretty good arguments to be made either way. But if someone argued that Blackwater ought to remain eligible to bid on federal contracts, and I told them making such an argument was effectively defending drunken rowdies raping and murdering civilians, they'd tell me I was completely FOS and rightly so.

Skinny and Ed Morrissey say any legislators who reject an ACORN funding ban, therefore support tax evasion and child prostitution. (Actually they don't even TRY to pass that off as "logic," they just sneak it in as their premise.)

Well, that's stupid. That's just letting offensive and insulting invective replace reasoning amd logic. And the offense isn't to liberals or Democrats, it's to everyone with a working brain.

September 15, 2009 at 14:17 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

Oh man, this is just getting better and better by the day.
I'd be careful of this one. Certificates of that sort can be generated from the Maryland Department of Taxation's website, and the info is based on the name of the organization. For instance, I know for a fact that my employer is licensed to do business in Maryland, but I can find 12-15 instances of their name (think corporate re-orgs, acquisitions, etc.) that show up as "dissolved" or "forfeited," as well as "active," "revived," and "old name." You could pick any one of these, pay $40 and get an "Internet Certificate" like the one shown on biggovernment.com.


I'm not saying that they're wrong, but I hoped they checked for things like name changes. According to City Paper's article:

At first, Klein stated that the group's failure to keep current on its taxes and other city bills was due to Hurricane Katrina's disastrous impact last fall on ACORN's national offices in New Orleans, where many of the state chapters' finances are administered. However, after researching the matter, Klein learned that in fact the payments had not been made because the bills had been sent to the group's old office at 825 Park Ave., Baltimore Organizing and Support Center's address of record.
I note that "Baltimore Organizing and Support Center's" registration is current and valid. I also note that, about a year ago, UppityWoman found a dozen ACORN affiliates in various states of incorporation and licensing in Maryland, from "forfeited" to "good standing."


Again, I'm not saying that this is wrong, but we probably shouldn't make too much of it until we've made sure that they didn't change their name or register under a different name. This may not be a smoking gun. Given that I could have an identical certificate printed and posted in 3 minutes for "Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc." (but we all know that there are Texaco stations in Maryland), I wouldn't be waving this one around just yet.

September 15, 2009 at 14:25 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

I agree with your points Wes, with the exception of #6... Although largely overlooked, ACORN abuses have been repeatedly reported across the nation over an expanded time frame.
Oh, I don't disagree; you'll recall that I've repeatedly agreed that law enforcement should follow the evidence wherever it leads. I just know that I've worked in more than a few situations where "local chapters" actually turned out to mean everything from "100-page instruction manual" to "oh, we just wing it." Even in our political discussions, we make a distinction between state/local political figures (e.g. local party chairs) and the DNC/RNC, right?


If the evidence points up the ladder, follow it. If not, nail the responsible parties and be done with it.

September 15, 2009 at 14:54 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

"Skinny and Ed Morrissey say..."

now if I could get people to throw my name in with Malkin, Beck and Limbaugh...
.. . . I'd feel high class. Everyday would be a great day.

September 15, 2009 at 16:28 | Unregistered CommenterSDiA

Whineyturd and Wessy= "Heckyl and Jeckyl"......... Blah, blah, blah!

They'd defend Satan as long as he was a demo-RAT!

September 15, 2009 at 19:22 | Unregistered Commentertazzmax

Tazzmaz, who's defending them? I've said, repeatedly, that the people responsible need to go to jail. I've said that law enforcement needs to investigate and go wherever the evidence takes them. I've said that, if national or regional ACORN officials are shown to be involved, they should be nailed.

How that turns into "defending" them is beyond me.

September 15, 2009 at 19:45 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Well, the Rafke bros should be indicted with RICO charges,....'cause it's plain as the nose on your face, but so far the silence from the 'RATs in congress and the judiciary has been deafening,....I wonder why?....Hmmm.

It surely wouldn't be 'cause they are wrapped around the Emperor like a glove, now would it?

Darrell Issa wanted to investigate the ACORNholers but the 'RATs ignored him.

September 15, 2009 at 19:55 | Unregistered Commentertazzmax

As I mentioned in another thread, I'm not a big fan of "Congressional investigations" into stuff outside of government; they have an annoying habit of granting immunity in exchange for testimony.

I don't want to see Issa grandstanding as a fake prosecutor, and I don't want to see [insert Democrat here] grandstanding in defense. I want the whole thing handled by law enforcement. When it comes to this kind of stuff, I trust a MD/CA/DC grand jury way more than I do either side of Congress.

September 15, 2009 at 23:23 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Did you use an assistance of a classification essay writing service for your professional release? I think that you really have great sample essay creating ability. Thanks so much for sharing this!

February 22, 2010 at 09:49 | Unregistered CommentergfSarah
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.