Search BL Rag
Recent Activity
Caption This


Click on the photo to submit your captions

About This Site

The BL RAG is dedicated to the idea of free expression, thus we welcome and encourage reader  commentary on current events and issues, music, sports, or other topics of interest, no matter what one's political leanings or worldview.

  

Site Management:

Front Page Section Editors: GrayRider and WesMorgan1

Other Front Page Editors: Bozio and Machiavelli

Smack Talk Editors: kwAwk and Skinnydipinacid

Miscellanea Editors: Kimboskerov, Xanadu, and Zoy Clem

Sports Editors: kwAwk and Skinnydipinacid

Games & Movie Editors: Skinnydipinacid

Poetry Editors: Lenny

Music Editors: Various (see the music schedule below).

***

Site Editors: Skinnydipinacid and Zoy Clem

Maintenance Man: Master Admin Dude

 

Alumni:
Redbeard, Winston, Jimmmco

 

KRAG Music Section Schedule:

Sunday - Zoy Clem

Monday - Xanadu

Tuesday - kwAwk

Wednesday - GrayRider

Thursday - Machiavelli

Friday - Fornax

Saturday - Skinnydipinacid

On-call - Schwabman

KRAG Free-n-Legal

Our latest Free-n-Legal MP3s

Powered by Squarespace
Use OpenOffice.org
« Mere Incompetence? You Decide... | Main | To All Of Our Veterans »
Wednesday
11Nov2009

Should 'Political Correctness' Bear Some Of The Blame In The Ft. Hood Attack?

Nidal Malik Hasan had long exhibited anti-American and pro radical Islam behavior, obvious to his friends and co-workers, prior to his Fort Hood, TX shooting in which he killed 13 and woundied 29. Yet no one said anything.

Finnell said he did just that during a year of study in which Hasan made a presentation "that justified suicide bombing" and spewed "anti-American propaganda" as he argued the war on terror was "a war against Islam." Finnell said he and at least one other student complained about Hasan, surprised that someone with "this type of vile ideology" would be allowed to wear an officer’s uniform.

But Finnell said no one filed a formal, written complaint about Hasan’s comments out of fear of appearing discriminatory.

Even various government agencies had information and concerns about Hasan's contacts, but did nothing in fear of possible consequences.

Investigators would have been "crucified" over First Amendment rights if they had launched a full-scale probe into e-mails Fort Hood massacre suspect Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan allegedly sent to a radical imam, a government investigator told Fox News.

Perhaps if growing fears of not being politically correct were replaced with, what used to be considered plain old common sense...this terrorist tragedy could have been averted. Perhaps.

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (18)

The articles you cite raise two lame points and one good point.

1) That "crucified" quote is a little selective. Here's what the guy actually said, later in the article:

Multiple investigators familiar with the FBI's review of the Fort Hood case told Fox News that they simply did not have enough evidence to launch an investigation. Though officials discovered Hasan's e-mails to the imam, one government counterterrorism investigator said the messages suggested he was seeking "spiritual and religious guidance."

"(Hasan) appeared to be at a moral impasse, a moral dilemma who was reaching out for advice," the investigator said. "Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we'd have been crucified."

In other words, the email didn't appear to point toward Islamist violence or jihad. The guy is right - if you tried to launch an Islamist/terror probe with no evidence, you'd be "crucified"...and justifiably so.


2) The "how would it look to fire a Muslim" question wasn't in the context of violence or anti-Americanism, either. As NPR reported:

Two psychiatrists who worked with Hasan at Walter Reed told NPR that during the six years he was there, he was frequently distracted and often late for work. The psychiatrists, who asked not to be identified, said that when on call, Hasan often would simply not answer the phone.

They also said Hasan once tried to convert a patient to Islam, telling him that Islam would "save his soul." Hasan received a verbal warning for that incident.

He was repeatedly warned about his performance, but officials said the problems had nothing to do with his faith.

At one point, the psychiatrists said, a former psychiatric director at Walter Reed, Scott Moran, sought to have Hasan dismissed, reportedly saying, "I do not think Hasan should carry the Walter Reed name." Moran, reached by NPR, declined to comment.

But the administrative procedure for removing a resident at Walter Reed was considered onerous, according to the psychiatrists, and a key official on a review committee reportedly asked how it might look to terminate a key resident who happened to be a Muslim.

Apparently, he was a pretty poor resident - but, again, there's no open anti-Americanism in this situation.


So, we're left with one big point, but it's a doozy:

3) If Hasan really gave a classroom presentation in which he criticized US war policy and defended suicide bombers, his classmates and superiors at USUHS should have raised the issue right then and there. There's your breakdown.

November 11, 2009 at 14:56 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

By the way, did you notice that Fox News referred to it as "faith-inspired violence?" I hadn't seen that one; I wonder what else fits in that bucket.

November 11, 2009 at 15:01 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

I'm sure ACORN played a role as well. And George Soros.

November 11, 2009 at 15:22 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

I'm curious on how big an investigation will come of this shooting. Bill Bennett @ CNN said for Tailhook in the 90's 4000 service personnel were interviewed and literally 100's had there military careers stopped. And no one died. we deserve at least the same level of investigation. We will see.

November 11, 2009 at 15:54 | Unregistered CommenterThomas Miller

I have to wonder how many people thought Hasan was doing a Corporal Klinger routine? Pretending to be a radical just for the sake of getting out of the military.

November 11, 2009 at 16:48 | Unregistered CommenterkwAwk

I have to wonder how many people thought Hasan was doing a Corporal Klinger routine? Pretending to be a radical just for the sake of getting out of the military.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and venture a guess....Hmmm, I'm thinkin'........NOBODY!!!

November 11, 2009 at 17:07 | Unregistered CommenterGrayRider

kwAwk brings up a good point.
And that gives me a stiffy.

November 11, 2009 at 22:00 | Unregistered CommenterGeneral Disarray

ACLU where are U?

November 12, 2009 at 08:13 | Unregistered CommenterTijuana

"I have to wonder how many people thought Hasan was doing a Corporal Klinger routine? Pretending to be a radical just for the sake of getting out of the military."

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and venture a guess....Hmmm, I'm thinkin'........NOBODY!!!

Actually, that's a fairly significant point. During my military service, I spent some time working in a personnel shop; at division level, we saw a good number of such 'fake artists.' In that day (peacetime), most of them were folks who had enlisted to learn a trade, and then wanted an expeditious means of leaving the service. We also had a few folks who, after enlisting for combat jobs, suddenly became conscientious objectors. The investigating officers sometimes had to do a fairly deep dive into the matter to separate the true problems from the fake artists.

Given that Hasan was already trying to get out of the service (to the point of hiring a civilian attorney), the acting route wouldn't be discounted by anyone investigating the matter.

November 12, 2009 at 10:03 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Amazing.

November 12, 2009 at 10:39 | Registered CommenterGrayRider

"We're witnessing the fruits of Obama's failures in the war on terror. And that's precisely why he doesn't want it to be called a terrorist act. He doesn't want us to realize that he is responsible, at least on his watch, for the first attack on our soil since 9/11...


"This entire process of spinning and deliberately mischaracterizing the attack is insidious and horrendous."

-Dick Morris

November 12, 2009 at 10:47 | Registered CommenterGrayRider

Right, right - does that mean that Fox News is aiding/abetting Obama by calling it "faith-inspired violence"?

November 12, 2009 at 12:28 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

More of a distraction from the real topics. Most people don't care about what a news organization says, does or puts their political weight behind. They're usually smart enough to know the difference between all of the networks that do. What they are concerned about is what the president is doing (or more accurately, NOT doing) than they are about what one network is calling the other, or how one political group feels about Fox News, or MSNBC, or whomever, or any of the other silly nonsense we call news these days.

The last person in the White House to go all vocal over Fox News had to step down? Anybody want to talk about her? Just add her to the list that includes Van Jones, another name only Fox News felt worth mentioning again and again.

Poor Anita. Dunn in done. WWMTTD*!?

November 12, 2009 at 14:31 | Unregistered CommenterBEEFCAKE

(*What Would Mao Tse Tung Do?)

November 12, 2009 at 14:31 | Unregistered CommenterBEEFCAKE

The last person in the White House to go all vocal over Fox News had to step down? Anybody want to talk about her? Just add her to the list

Silly, transparent Nooshans, ceaselessly claiming scalps (and sweet victory!) with every dawn for successfully exhorting the sun to rise. It’s well known Dunn had only taken on her job on a temporary basis to begin with. But Beefcake, if you’re loathe to let that champagne in the fridge go flat, hell, be my guest! Bottoms up! Yet another glorious victory! More good news for conservatives!

November 12, 2009 at 16:06 | Unregistered CommenterWinston

Temporary? Hmmmmmmmmm, How convenient. Well known among moonbats who buy into all obama/left wing media dribble....

Gotta go now, gotta take my leisure suit to the cleaners, later dude..

November 12, 2009 at 16:50 | Unregistered CommenterTijuana

I'm tired of this bullshit. Every muslim serving in our armed forces should have to reaffirm their military oath of service or face immediate discharge.

November 12, 2009 at 17:36 | Unregistered Commentermachiavelli

It is good to see the dribble actually works on some though Tijuana. It makes me feel like my tax dollars aren't being complete y wasted. It also seems to keep the crazies distracted and prevents them from having to witness their party's leaders attacking each other. (Not to mention their inevitable self destruction)

Today's excuse: It's all going to be Joe Lieberman's fault. Funny.

Sure, I'll chuckle it up, but champaign is for whoosies. I'll instead toast my glass, filled to the brim with some Crown Royal on the rocks, and I'll do so by watching Glenn Beck laugh, and laugh, and laugh his ass off about Ms. Dunn's "untimely decision." I do find it interesting that people weren't chiming in unison before her attacks on Fox News, nor during, only after the backlash seemed to overwhelm the White House, as do many things I see.

It's like we are witnessing our nations first "lame-duck-supreme-majority?"

I do appreciate the nice attempt to downplay the story though. Partial credit for equivocating conservatism with the barbaric act of husking the brain from another liberal muttonhead. It made me laugh like a silly person.

November 12, 2009 at 18:01 | Unregistered CommenterBEEFCAKE

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>