Recent Activity
Search
About This Site

The BL RAG is dedicated to the idea of free expression, thus we welcome and encourage reader commentary on current events, issues, music, sports, or other topics of interest, no matter what one's political leanings or worldview.

  

Editors: Bozio, ChicagoNeoCon, Fornax, GrayRider, Kimboskerov, kwAwk, Machiavelli, Redbeard, Skinnydipinacid, Tijuana, Wes Morgan, Xanadu, and Zoy Clem

Contributors:

Lenny and Trackerdog

Maintenance Man:

Master Admin Dude

Alumni:

Winston
Powered by Squarespace
Use OpenOffice.org
« New Year's Eve Open Thread | Main | RNC Accuses Bush of Going Socialist »
Tuesday
30Dec

Lizard People For US Senate

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (12)

Forgive me Winston, but from this time forward everytime I see you write the words "straight white men over 50", I am going to add, for my own enjoyment only, the additional words, "who can all kick Winston's ass".

It is a technique which may allow me to stomach reading more of what you write.

signed, 51 year old white male formerly known as Duff, man

December 30, 2008 at 22:15 | Registered CommenterDuff, man

What's so strange about voting for Lizard People?

A few days ago I would have laughed and called this person a raving lunatic, but I've come to learn that at least 11.1% of BLRag editors actually believe that demons are real life creatures that attack their friends at night. We shouldn't mock this person's religion now should we?

Luckily, I'm immune to both demons and Lizard People.

December 30, 2008 at 23:14 | Unregistered CommenterThe Egg Man

Duff, you have to admit that the "holiday gift" of a CD including "Barack the Magic Negro" was a stunningly boneheaded move for one who would chair the RNC. Only slightly less boneheaded are those lining up to defend the aforementioned clown. Yes, there's a place for satire, but I don't think that Christmas packages from RNC leaders--who are busy talking about how they need to reach minority voters, right?--isn't the right place, and this certainly isn't the right time.

Egg, careful - I'm pretty sure that your 11% number is low, since I'm among the number in question. *laugh*

December 31, 2008 at 01:26 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Actually, I think that the LA Times hits the nail on the proverbial head. They answer the "is he racist?" question with a hearty "who cares," but then point out:

But Saltsman still deserves to be raked over the coals. Not for anything to do with Obama, per se, but for campaigning with cultural references that are decades out of date.


"Puff the Magic Dragon?" You've got to be kidding. Was he on another planet Nov. 4? Did he miss how Republicans lost 66% of the vote of people age 30 and under? Thirty-year-olds weren’t even born when Peter, Paul and Mary's hit came out in 1963. Sure Limbaugh used the parody and his crowd loved it, but the average Limbaugh listener is 51. Then there's the parody itself and the faux Sharpton. Sure the Rev. deserves the disdain and disapprobation he earned for his outrageous behavior during the Tawana Brawley hoax case, but that happened in 1987. The World Wide Web wasn't even invented then, which means young people have never heard of it. To them, Sharpton is just that black guy from New York with the funny hair.

It's a given that Republicans are done trying to appeal to black voters, but are they really ready to give up everyone else who isn't white? Because if not, here's the thing: it’s not much of a stretch for Latinos and Asians -- who also voted overwhelmingly for Obama -- to imagine how a president-elect of their ethnicity also could be the target of such lighthearted Republican fun. "Mike the Magic Jap” and “Maria the Magic Mexican” probably wouldn't go over that well either.

THATi is why neither Salsman nor his defenders should be in sniffing distance of an RNC leadership position.

December 31, 2008 at 01:31 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

As I posted earlier, Saltsman needs to be slapped for so grossly underestimating the leftist's ability to disingenuously fabricate racist incidents. He is indeed unqualified to lead, based upon his inability to understand the opposition.

December 31, 2008 at 05:58 | Unregistered CommenterRedbeard

"Duff, you have to admit that the "holiday gift" of a CD including "Barack the Magic Negro" was a stunningly boneheaded move for one who would chair the RNC."

You know, Wes, you'd think so, but apparently, based on the tsunami of support it's engendered, it was a stroke of genius.

They are bound and determined to become the Alabama Party. And far be it from me to dissuade reichwingers grimly intent on running over a cliff. Give 'em what they want.

December 31, 2008 at 11:02 | Registered CommenterWinston

Did you see me supporting anything? Wes, I know you are just trying to engage me in the conversation, but sometimes your leading statements such as "you have to admit" come off as a bit condescending.

For the record, the idea of the song sounds stupid and anyone who plays it or passes it along is an idiot. Even if the premise of the song began in some semi-legitimate fashion, which I don't really believe, it is still offensive as a subject matter. Any thinking person, even if they believe the song to be harmless, should have understood that most people do not think of the song as anything but offensive.

But, I have not heard the song, and I am not interested in hearing it.

All I was really protesting was Winston's broad strokes of bigotry against white straight males over 50. I also have a distaste for those who seem to hate all those who have faith. But that doesn't make me dislike any particular demographic group, it just makes me dislike the person who makes such statements.

December 31, 2008 at 12:04 | Registered CommenterDuff, man

"Winston's broad strokes of bigotry against white straight males over 50"

Oh, brother. Up is truly down, eh?

December 31, 2008 at 17:34 | Registered CommenterWinston

Whoa - my apologies for sounding condescending...such was most certainly not my intent.

I like political satire as much as the next guy, but one has to be in a position to employ it. I don't think that this guy is a racist, but rather hamhanded; the Republican "brand" isn't in a position to employ satire where minorities are concerned. That's why I thought that the LA Times analysis was spot-on-target...

December 31, 2008 at 21:16 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

You thin skinned liberals need yo get over it, it was satire and it was funny.
Y'all are faking outrage because someone would DARE insult your boy,..the holy Obambi!
If it was about a republican,..that'd be just fine though,...huh?
WeSSY, when in the hell did you ever have concern over who runs the RNC?
You commie/libs think "reaching out " to minorities requires pandering........

Ask the RINOs how well "pandering" has served them in the last election.

January 1, 2009 at 16:51 | Unregistered Commentertazzmax

Tazz, I have no desire for a one-party state. There is much to be welcomed from the conservative viewpoint, but the Republicans have done a horrendous job of practicing conservatism. I'd like to see someone lead the RNC to more expansive positions on traditional conservative beliefs, instead of merely pandering to the moral conservatives.

As far as the "outrage" is concerned, I'm not outraged; I don't even think that the guy in question is a racist. All I said was that it's pretty dumb (politically) to offer satire to audiences one hopes to attract. Duh.

January 2, 2009 at 10:08 | Registered Commenterwesmorgan1

Yeah Wes, ....but WHY do you care?....You're NOT a conservative, so why should it make a diff to you?

And BTW, the RINOs have NOT been "practising" conservatism, that's why they are DOA.

"Pandering to social conservatives"?..........BS.

"Pandering" to special interests and minorities,....YES!

January 2, 2009 at 17:19 | Unregistered Commentertazzmax

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>